Keshi’s Super Eagles underperformed tactically and mentally in their Group F opener against Iran on Monday night.
The mood in Nigeria is at an all-time low following the Super Eagles disappointing 0-0 draw with Iran in Curitiba.
Having experienced mainly clement
weather in many urban centres since the World Cup kicked off, Nigerians
witnessed the skies give way in the middle of the afternoon on Monday.
If you are one for omens and portents, then you may have been tempted to
agree with the majority who saw the sudden downpour as a sign of a
momentous victory to come.
What they got instead was the most
turgid display of the World Cup so far, in a game that could not end
quickly enough. It provided us with the tournament’s first draw, and a
goalless one at that.
This was not in the script.
Could it be then that the heavens, in their prescience, foresaw the outcome and wept in abjection and anguish?
The challenge was clear for all to see: the Super Eagles had to hit the ground running.
With Iran, you would be hard pressed to
find a more defensive-minded and unimaginative team in the entire
competition. Neither was this an act of containment by Team Melli. They
really are set up to not concede, and in this, Carlos Queiroz has
shown the full range of his expertise, drilling a group of average
players into a fierce defensive regiment.
The question then is: with the challenge
already thrown down, why was Stephen Keshi unable to devise a coherent
enough attacking strategy to overcome it? It is, after all, what coaches
are paid to do. The dark arts of Jose Mourinho taught us that it is
easier to coach defensive organisation than attacking coherence, but
Iran were never going to re-invent themselves like Bosnia-Herzegovina
have done.
Mind games or just ignorance from Keshi?
On the eve of the game, Keshi went on
record as saying he had no knowledge of the Iranian team. There are two
possibilities with this statement. Either he was telling the truth, a
possibility which is surely too naive to countenance; or he was trying
to play mind games.
It is hard to tell which would be more worrying.
The Nigerian team started the game
brightly, hitting the target within two minutes and drawing a last-ditch
tackle to deny Ahmed Musa on eight minutes.
That was as good as it got.
The high tempo with which the Super
Eagles started abated quickly, and all semblance of strategy went out
the window as the team simply resorted to hopeful punts forward from
deep in midfield. When the passes did hit their mark, Iran simply
gobbled up the second balls; the deep midfield pairing of Andranik
Teymourian and Javad Nekounam deserves credit for its discipline,
creating an impenetrable square with their centre-backs.
For all Iran’s obduracy however, it is
hard to shake the feeling that Keshi did just as much to frustrate his
own team with the baffling decision to persist in playing Ramon Azeez in
the central role behind the striker. The Almeria youngster enjoyed a
break-out season in Andalusia playing deeper, and looked utterly lost
here as he did in the friendly against the USA. He was often bypassed,
an indication that his teammates have no confidence in him to carry the
team’s creative burden. When he did receive the ball on occasion, he
appeared hesitant and overawed, quick to cede responsibility by playing
unambitious passes sideways.
Azeez | Struggling with responsibility
The one player who the entire team do look to contrived to have his least effective showing ever in a Super Eagles shirt.
John Obi Mikel plays a role that is
entirely at odds with his Chelsea incarnation, tasked with providing
incision from the central zone. He wears the no.10 shirt, and this has
unsurprisingly led to comparisons with Jay-Jay Okocha, that wondrous
bohemian creator who wore the number with distinction for many years.
They are of course nothing alike (no one is as outrageously skilled as
Jay-Jay), but the burden of the shirt dictates that in times of
adversity, the wearer step up.
Mikel completely failed to.
The Chelsea man appeared disinterested
and languid, sapped of ideas and passion. At one point, Vincent Enyeama
sought to roll the ball out, but it was Mikel’s midfield partner Ogenyi
Onazi who made himself available for the pass. Mikel simply turned his
back and trudged away.
There is a sense that he does not grasp
the weight of the shirt, and the responsibility that comes with it. One
is reminded of the France 98 Round of 16 encounter against Denmark; even
in a losing effort, Okocha distinguished himself, running the Danish
defence ragged. Surely if he cannot be motivated enough by the pride of
the shirt, Mikel has to realise that there is no greater shop window
than the World Cup. Few managers or scouts would be enamoured with a
defensive midfielder who is reluctant to receive a pass from his own
goalkeeper.
His lethargy spread to the rest of the
squad: winger Victor Moses was anonymous, and was rightly withdrawn
after only 52 minutes; Ogenyi Onazi took on too much responsibility and
kept losing the ball in midfield; the usually excellent Emmanuel
Emenike fizzled out after a bright opening fifteen minutes.
The introductions of Shola Ameobi and
Osaze Odemwingie did little to provide a spark in a ponderous attacking
display lacking any invention. Truth be told, Iran were never truly
stretched. Neither was the Nigerian defence, but even at that defensive
stalwart Godfrey Oboabona contrived to pick up a knock that saw him
replaced in the first half. He is now a doubt for the next game.
Remarkably for such a depressing
performance, not much has changed with regards to the group. The Super
Eagles hold their destiny in their hands. A win over Bosnia-Herzegovina
will see Nigeria through with a game to spare. Keshi’s reputation as a
slow starter is preserved, but it is his reputation as an expert man
manager, as well as his tactical nous, that will now be put to the
test.
A recording of Bosnia’s loss to Argentina at the Maracana would not go amiss either.
No comments:
Post a Comment